Return-Path: Received: from smtp9.gateway.net ([208.230.117.253]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Fri, 24 Sep 1999 01:36:26 -0400 Received: from oemcomputer (1Cust166.tnt1.coeur-dalene.id.da.uu.net [208.254.107.166]) by smtp9.gateway.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id BAA22652 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 1999 01:40:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <000501bf064f$7f4255a0$a66bfed0@oemcomputer> Reply-To: "dfs" From: "dfs" To: "Lancair List" Subject: SB050-0999 Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 22:41:47 -0700 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I built my Lancair long before you'all started using the later adhesives - such as Hysol, etc. My plane used Hexcell Safety-Poxy for wet lay-ups and 2216 (Mfr?) for the structural adhesive, so I have no experience with the later adhesives and resins. given all that, I now am planning to comply with the subject SB and would like some comments and advice from the LML gang as to what should realistically be used here. I'm getting the feeling from what I've gleaned on other subjects that the Hysol is the adhesive of choice. What is the current thinking concerning the fiberglass resin? All suggestions gratefully accepted. Thanks, Dan Schaefer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html