X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 00:20:55 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net ([216.148.227.152] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.7) with ESMTP id 965846 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 23:00:05 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.148.227.152; envelope-from=colwells@comcast.net Received: from office (c-67-187-174-214.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[67.187.174.214]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with SMTP id <20060203035914m120079mv0e>; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 03:59:19 +0000 From: "Steve/Claudette Colwell" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: Testing hoses X-Original-Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 19:59:43 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_04BC_01C62833.39F5EFE0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcYoaq2N14FnEe/rTtO1Oygpe4BmcgACrtcA In-Reply-To: X-Original-Message-ID: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_04BC_01C62833.39F5EFE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Leighton, Thanks for your latest tip. Who is the best source for Aeroquip hose and fittings? What are the pros and cons of 701 vs Teflon? Steve Colwell Legacy ------=_NextPart_000_04BC_01C62833.39F5EFE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Leighton,

Thanks for your latest tip. = Who is the best source for Aeroquip hose and fittings? What are the pros and = cons of 701 vs Teflon?

Steve Colwell = Legacy

------=_NextPart_000_04BC_01C62833.39F5EFE0--