X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 12:06:17 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [64.12.137.3] (HELO imo-m22.mail.aol.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.7) with ESMTP id 963345 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 08:51:55 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.3; envelope-from=MikeEasley@aol.com Received: from MikeEasley@aol.com by imo-m22.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r6.3.) id q.19e.44638bfe (4214) for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 08:51:07 -0500 (EST) From: MikeEasley@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <19e.44638bfe.311216cb@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 08:51:07 EST Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Antenna Lead X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1138801867" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5300 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1138801867 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Scott, I bet someone (not me) could tell you which would create more loss, a connector or the length of RG58. Is your #1 com external? I'm assuming your #2 com is the composite type in the vert stab. It might be easier to just go external with your #2 com. Antennas are cheaper than splitters. Mike Easley Colorado Springs -------------------------------1138801867 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Scott,

I bet someone (not me) could tell you which would create more loss, a=20 connector or the length of RG58.

Is your #1 com external? I'm assuming your #2 com is the composit= e=20 type in the vert stab. It might be easier to just go external with you= r #2=20 com. Antennas are cheaper than splitters.

Mike Easley

Colorado Springs

-------------------------------1138801867--