X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [69.171.58.236] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 5.0.7)
  with HTTP id 963009 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:03:45 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: Runway checks, passes, flybys
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.0.7
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:03:45 -0500
Message-ID: <web-963009@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <CFF649DA-30D5-4C39-A985-97484FCB865D@dynacomm.ws>
References: <CFF649DA-30D5-4C39-A985-97484FCB865D@dynacomm.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for Lorn H Olsen <lorn@dynacomm.ws>:

  I don't think that I will ever understand how Hamid can be so  informative
sometimes and such a jerk at other times.
  
  Hamid, why don't you send a letter to your FSDO telling them that you  don't
like someone else's approach and asked them to make the  approach that you
like a requirement for all aircraft. Don't forget  to include the altitude
that you like. Just because smaller airplanes  are taught to enter the pattern
at 1,000 ft and part 135 turboprops  are taught to enter at 1,500 ft, you
should send a letter to your  FSDO and asked them to make all aircraft enter
at the altitude that  you think is best.
  
  Oh, and by the way, don't forget to tell them to shove it if they  don't 
like
your way. What is there to loose?