Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #33575
From: <MikeEasley@aol.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Operating over congested areas
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:17:58 -0500
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Charlie,
 
This is a small, but potentially significant, factor if someone were to lose an engine over a populated area and execute an off field landing, and cause property damage or worse.
 
Standard DAR wording that you quoted:
 PHASE II
 
  (9) This aircraft is prohibited from operating in congested airways or over
densely populated areas unless directed by Air Traffic Control, or unless
sufficient altitude is maintained to effect a safe emergency landing in the
event of a power unit failure, without hazard to persons or property on the
surface.
 
But FAR 91.119 states:
Minimum safe altitudes: General.

Except when necessary for takeoff or landing, no person may operate an aircraft below the following altitudes:

(a) Anywhere. An altitude allowing, if a power unit fails, an emergency landing without undue hazard to persons or property on the surface.
 
My concern is the word "undue" that's included in the FARs.  That sounds like an opening for the FAA to file some violation against us Experimental guys if we have an off airport landing in a populated area.
 
Maybe I'm splitting hairs, but that's the stuff lawyers make a living doing.  Without the word "undue", we now have to insure we create "zero" hazard situation.
 
I guess I wish I had the "undue" in my Operating Limitations.
 
Mike Easley
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster