In a message dated 12/24/2005 9:33:44 A.M. Central Standard Time,
lorn@dynacomm.ws writes:
Why are
you so sure that mags won't support larger gaps? With
standard Slick
4300 mags, I run my Iridum plugs at .024". The engine
starts all of
the time on the first blade, cold or hot. If I wanted
to experiment,
I would try, and do believe that it would work,
setting my plugs at
.050". If the engine would start in the first
place, the mags
develop more energy as the RPM increases, you could
be sure that it
would keep running.
Has anyone experimented with larger gaps on Iridium
plugs or is
everybody just guessing?
Lorn,
If you go to a DENSO site (for example) and read about the benefits of
iridium plugs, you will see that one benefit is less resistance to the spark
making the jump - better even than platinum. Your flight regime is not a
good example - you fly high (less resistance to arcing), without a hi
compression ratio (hi = more resistance to arcing) and at lower power
settings. You will not necessarily see ignition problems with the larger
gap because of these conditions. Regardless of the rpm, mags generally
produce no more than 12K Volts whilst EIs are around 40K and CDIs around
60K. Also, generally, an EI never misses a spark - not true of Slick
mags.
Hot starts with a carb do not present any problems - injected engines
suffer from vapor locks and premature vaporization from heat induced
in the fine lines that run over the top of the engine to each injector.
Nothing wrong with your set up - it might not work for folks that have
different objectives. The interesting part is the range extension you
probably would achieve with spark advance at the hi altitudes you utilize.
Have you considered trying my LASAR, it is for sale.