X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:23:22 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from esmtp.cave.com ([66.35.72.5] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.4) with ESMTP id 893696 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 10:25:16 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.35.72.5; envelope-from=lancair@ustek.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([70.61.176.138]) by esmtp.cave.com (VisNetic.MailServer.v7.2.4.1) with ASMTP id CQN38002 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 10:24:25 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <43AC16AD.3020206@ustek.com> X-Original-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 10:24:29 -0500 From: N301ES Reply-To: lancair@ustek.com Organization: USTEK Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Where has all the power gone? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070203020901030501000103" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070203020901030501000103 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sky2high@aol.com wrote: > Balderdash! > > Luckily, your plane won't be flying on the dyno. > > Now is the time to prove yourself the experimenter that we all know > you are. You do have an experimental airplane, don't you? Some > adjustments may be required. So - there it is then! 9 responses with 9 rational approaches yielding four options. Two mags, one mag one LSE, two LSE, two mags and wait patiently for Prism. Each configuration has arguments for and against. Not enough systems out there to get any trend analysis - it's all mainly anecdotal. As the Greyhawk says, we are experimental after all. I will stay with the dual LSE and see where it takes me. With some data in hand I will approach Klaus and discuss any fine tuning that might be necessary. Sure do appreciate all the input! Robert M. Simon, ES-P N301ES --------------070203020901030501000103 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sky2high@aol.com wrote:

Balderdash!

Luckily, your plane won't be flying on the dyno.

Now is the time to prove yourself the experimenter that we all know you are. You do have an experimental airplane, don't you? Some adjustments may be required.

So - there it is then! 9 responses with 9 rational approaches yielding four options. Two mags, one mag one LSE, two LSE, two mags and wait patiently for Prism. Each configuration has arguments for and against. Not enough systems out there to get any trend analysis - it's all mainly anecdotal. As the Greyhawk says, we are experimental after all. I will stay with the dual LSE and see where it takes me. With some data in hand I will approach Klaus and discuss any fine tuning that might be necessary.

Sure do appreciate all the input!

Robert M. Simon, ES-P N301ES

--------------070203020901030501000103--