X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 11:32:03 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m18.mx.aol.com ([64.12.138.208] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.2) with ESMTP id 847526 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 00:09:41 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.138.208; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-m18.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r6.3.) id q.282.5ce4d7 (48624) for ; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 00:08:53 -0500 (EST) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <282.5ce4d7.30ba9965@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 00:08:53 EST Subject: Re: [LML] B and C Batteries X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1133068133" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5300 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1133068133 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 11/26/2005 4:24:05 P.M. Central Standard Time, julian@pridmorebrown.com writes: I recently replaced a B and C battery, and it seems that they have changed both the position and type of terminal. The original battery was the BC104-1 and they told me the comparable replacement was the BC116-1. The new battery has screw-in type terminals on the top versus the vertical terminals with a bolt hole on the old one. Has anyone encountered this problem? Julian, I find it interesting that you have been successful with such a small battery - 16 AH. Are you located in one of those nice permanently warm climates? I did encounter a battery change B&C made some years back in order to improve the BC110-1 (28 AH). Indeed the terminals were reversed and I had to make a new (+) to Master Relay cable (1.5' lengthened to 2') and, since I had greater flexibility with the ground cable, no change was required with the (-) connection. The terminals remained the same. Ahhhh, the price of improvements. Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96 Aurora, IL (KARR) -------------------------------1133068133 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message dated 11/26/2005 4:24:05 P.M. Central Standard Time,=20 julian@pridmorebrown.com writes:
<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>I=20 recently replaced a B and C battery, and it seems that they have=20 changed
both the position and type of terminal. The original battery wa= s=20 the BC104-1
and they told me the comparable replacement was the BC116-1= .=20 The new battery
has screw-in type terminals on the top versus the verti= cal=20 terminals with a
bolt hole on the old one.

Has anyone encounter= ed=20 this problem?
Julian,
 
I find it interesting that you have been successful with such a small=20 battery - 16 AH.  Are you located in one of those nice permanently= =20 warm climates?
 
I did encounter a battery change B&C made some years back= =20 in order to improve the BC110-1 (28 AH).  Indeed the terminals wer= e=20 reversed and I had to make a new (+) to Master Relay cable (1.5' lengthened=20= to=20 2') and, since I had greater flexibility with the ground cable, no chan= ge=20 was required with the (-) connection.  The terminals remained the=20 same.  Ahhhh, the price of improvements.
 
 
Scott Krueger=20 AKA Grayhawk
Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96
Aurora, IL=20 (KARR)



-------------------------------1133068133--