X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 11:22:34 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m26.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.7] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c3) with ESMTP id 742169 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:12:23 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.7; envelope-from=VTAILJEFF@aol.com Received: from VTAILJEFF@aol.com by imo-m26.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r5.5.) id q.209.a8d33b9 (48624) for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:11:25 -0400 (EDT) From: VTAILJEFF@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <209.a8d33b9.306ddcac@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:11:24 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Insurance X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1128039084" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5200 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1128039084 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/28/2005 10:01:34 P.M. Central Standard Time, lancair@ustek.com writes: My question is - if Lancair has negotiated a better program with AIG, how much will I save by abiding by the new restrictions? So far it looks like I'll be paying more. Is your current quote from AIG or another underwriter? Jeff -------------------------------1128039084 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In a message dated 9/28/2005 10:01:34 P.M. Central Standard Time,=20 lancair@ustek.com writes:

<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>My=20 question is - if Lancair has negotiated a better program with AIG, how muc= h=20 will I save by abiding by the new restrictions? So far it looks like= =20 I'll be paying more.

Is your current quote from AIG or another underwriter?

Jeff

-------------------------------1128039084--