X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 10:07:59 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m24.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.5] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c2) with ESMTP id 733338 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 07:30:10 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.5; envelope-from=MikeEasley@aol.com Received: from MikeEasley@aol.com by imo-m24.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r5.5.) id q.200.af1d5ee (57341) for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 07:29:24 -0400 (EDT) From: MikeEasley@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <200.af1d5ee.30693594@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 07:29:24 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Lancair approved inspectors? X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1127734164" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5200 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1127734164 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jeff, Thanks for giving me all that credit. I could probably do an adequate inspection on an ES, but that's about the limit of my experience. I'm not a CFI. Mike Easley Colorado Springs -------------------------------1127734164 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Jeff,

Thanks for giving me all that credit. I could probably do an adeq= uate=20 inspection on an ES, but that's about the limit of my experience. I'm=20= not=20 a CFI.

Mike Easley

Colorado Springs

-------------------------------1127734164--