Return-Path: Received: from burgoyne.com ([209.197.0.8]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 08:16:27 -0400 Received: from clkeller.burgoyne.com (pma7.burgoyne.com [209.197.2.9]) by burgoyne.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id GAA06044 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 06:20:00 -0600 Message-ID: <37BE98E7.391D@burgoyne.com> Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 06:17:43 -0600 From: "C.L.Keller" To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Subject: GM4 reinforcement X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I looked in the LML Attachments the other day and found "LNC2 GM4 reinforcement / Factory fax to Dan Olsen." I've been hoping someone would ask these questions, but since no one has, I'll ask. Can anyone tell us the background to this reinforcement. Looks pretty significant to me. What brought it about? How did Dan happen to find out about it? Would anyone else have learned about it except for the way we did? Dan, can you answer any of these questions? Charles Keller [Charles... there was a discussion here quite some time ago regarding failures of that component when the gear was subjected to excessive side loads. I think it was one of the builders in The Netherlands who came up with the suggestion. As a result I incorporated a similar reinforcement into my gear wells during the gear installation process, although I confess mine is much less substantial than that recommended by the factory fax, (and can be seen on the LML homepage as well). If you search the archives for GM4 you'll find many references to this area and will undoubtedly locate the original posting that brought about this modification. ] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML homepage: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html