X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [69.171.52.140] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 5.0c2) with HTTP id 723711 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 22:47:56 -0400 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: FAA Trying to stop us all? To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.0c2 Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 22:47:56 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "Bill Hooker" : For those of us who built their airplanes without any Fastbuild or Factory Assist options, this simply seems to be an application of the long standing principal that our airplanes are homebuilt and licensed in the Experimental Catagory. With the ever increasing complexity of our very high performance kit planes, all but a handfull of people are unable to build them alone anymore. The kit plane manufacturers have had to go into the fastbuild and factory assist programs to keep and increase their growth. In effect, they have circumvented the true spirit of amateur built aircraft to provide an airplane that is more complex than most certified planes by using the Experimental catagory as it was never intended. Maybe we should have a new catagory for factory built, very high performance planes that cannot get certified as we know the safety requirements of the FAA. Why not allow anyone to go into the business of building airplanes for resale. I have no problem with that, but don't say it is 51% or more built by the original owner, when it is not! I wonder if this whole subject has anything to do with our unsatisfactory safety record and very high insurance rates? Bill Hooker Lancair IV-P 700 Hrs. Repairman Certificate # 2563704 p.s. I certainly hope we never loose the Experimental catagory for amatuer built aircraft. What a great privelege.