Return-Path: Received: from smtp8.gateway.net ([208.230.117.252]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 01:11:19 -0400 Received: from gateway.net (1Cust134.tnt1.coeur-dalene.id.da.uu.net [208.254.107.134]) by smtp8.gateway.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA21226 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 01:14:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <37AD1222.D9504ECF@gateway.net> Date: Sat, 07 Aug 1999 22:14:10 -0700 From: dfs To: Lancair List Subject: More new pre-flight item comments X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Comments re: Jerry Grimmonpre's message describing how he plans to use reed switches (in place of the standard micro-switch) to indicate when his gear is in the "quiet landing" configuration. Like a lot of things, sounds good but misses something crucial in the application. The micro-switches can be adjusted to actuate, mechanically, within a few thousandths of the same point every time. Means you can really sense the relatively small over-center travel of your links when they truly are locked -- and you won't get a light if they aren't over center. Unfortunately, the magnetic reed switches can't RELIABLY make that fine a distinction. A clear case of getting too fancy. The mechanical, cheap-o device, in this particular application at least, is far superior to the (slightly) higher tech one. Besides, my switches, and attending wires don't move, they're all attached to the "pork-chop" fitting (don't remember the P/N) with the actuating roll-pin sticking out of the moveable upper link segment. Even so, there's nothing wrong those wires flexing a bit, 's one of the reasons wire is flexible. Put in a small service loop (1 - 2 inches) and forget it until your next annual. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML homepage: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html