X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 20:18:13 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net ([204.127.202.55] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 952272 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 21 May 2005 17:24:17 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.202.55; envelope-from=colwells@comcast.net Received: from office (c-67-187-167-247.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[67.187.167.247]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with SMTP id <2005052121233101100op5cie>; Sat, 21 May 2005 21:23:31 +0000 From: "Steve/Claudette Colwell" X-Original-To: "'John Barrett'" <2thman@cablespeed.com>, "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: Brakes and Live Locks X-Original-Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 14:23:22 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcVaGdEtw+M0/tycRCKaj9cuSGapvAEIq7qw In-Reply-To: X-Original-Message-ID: "Thanks for your inquiry. I would (will) use two pins for the bottom cowl on my Lancair IV, but will make them long so that they protrude when inserted from the bottom 6 or 8 inches into the lower portion of the upper cowl to the point where they just begin to get into the tight radius as the cowling starts to turn to horizontal." "Then I will either design a sandwich slot for the top back portion of the upper cowl (much like the forward attachment for the flap mounting hardware access covers on the rear of the wing in the IV)." Do you have a photo of this? "The other option I am considering but is my second choice is to add a third pin - but not a fourth - that would retain the rear section of the upper cowl along its horizontal portion. This pin would not have to turn any sharp corners but would have to insert within a long filleted approach at a low angle." Does this mean it is better to insert the pin in a location with more radius rather than the flatter top center of the cowl that would require two upper pins? "In terms of ease of use, the Carbinge will make the necessary curves. Virtually any turn you can make in aluminum without distorting the metal you can do with Carbinge. With regard to pin insertion, we have had two or maybe three customers who have had difficulty with too much friction. We have developed smaller diameter pins and we keep some on hand. If you are having trouble with the standard size pin, we trade them out. You return the standard pin to me undamaged, and I send you a replacement with a smaller diameter. We have them with Keepers already attached, so you don't have to wait for us to make them up. Obviously, we want the pins to be as tight as possible while still being manageable, so we ask you to try the standard pin first, then we'll switch them out only if the problem occurs." If the smaller diameter pins are used to make it easier to insert them, does the cowl move or shift position? I understand it would reduce the strength but since Carbinge is so much stronger than other attachments would it still have an adequate safety margin? Steve Colwell Legacy John, Will Carbinge Keeper Pins turn the radius of a Legacy or IV Cowl to Fuselage attach using Carbinge? If so, will 2 Pins for the bottom cowl and 2 Pins for the top cowl usually suffice? Where would the recommended entrance points be located? Is it a struggle to insert the Pins? Steve Colwell Legacy in the sanding stage Subject: [LML] Re: Brakes and Live Locks Posted for "John Barrett" <2thman@cablespeed.com>: Hinges for cowling - get rid of the ugly little blemishes and save a hell of a lot of money. At the same time you get a better fit and attachment (by spreading the forces all the way across the junction of the two parts)! Another shameless plug for Carbinge graphite hinges. John Barrett Barrett/Garrett Enterprises, Inc. PO Box 428 Pt. Hadlock, WA 98339 www.carbinge.com