X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [70.118.69.16] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.3c5) with HTTP id 950697 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 20 May 2005 01:11:22 -0400 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: IV fuel valve question To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.3c5 Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 01:11:22 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <000001c55cbd$011fe910$6401a8c0@axs> References: <000001c55cbd$011fe910$6401a8c0@axs> X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "terrence o'neill" : A 'P.S.' to Scott's: For less worry about header gas, go to www.fuelsafe.com. Terrence Lancair N211AL IO320 (99%) Greenville, IL GRE """ I am not suggesting you consider a header tank - there are some that are nervous about it becoming an anti-fungal foot bath. For airplanes with two wings but more than two tanks, I would transfer pump the aux tank(s) to the wing(s), thus a simpler system that makes more fuel usable. """