Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:54:36 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net ([204.127.198.39] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8) with ESMTP id 613959 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:47:06 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.198.39; envelope-from=steve@oasissolutions.com Received: from admin (c-67-164-84-7.client.comcast.net[67.164.84.7]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP id <2005012001462801500csrpde>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 01:46:28 +0000 Reply-To: From: "Steve Richard" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Furlongs per Fortnight X-Original-Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 17:46:25 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: <005901c4fe91$da7ee9c0$6401a8c0@admin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_005A_01C4FE4E.CC5DF3B0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_005A_01C4FE4E.CC5DF3B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sounds good, but how many firkins per fortnight were you burning? Steve Richard steve@oasissolutions.com -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Jason Beaver Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 4:39 PM To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: [LML] Re: Furlongs per Fortnight Not quite 180 knots, but I'll give it to you...:-) http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=556793+furlongs+per+fortnight+in+kn ots&btnG=Search for those who can't think that quickly... jason On Jan 19, 2005, at 2:15 PM, Sky2high@aol.com wrote: Thanks for the suggestion. A week ago I was zipping along at 556793 FF (Furls/Fortnit) and, doing a quick mental conversion for the sake of the LML Knot standard, I noted that it was a mere 180 Kts. E Pluribus Unum Grayhawk ------=_NextPart_000_005A_01C4FE4E.CC5DF3B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Sounds=20 good, but how many firkins per fortnight were you = burning?

Steve Richard =
steve@oasissolutions.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing = List=20 [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Jason = Beaver
Sent:=20 Wednesday, January 19, 2005 4:39 PM
To: Lancair Mailing=20 List
Subject: [LML] Re: Furlongs per=20 Fortnight

Not quite 180 knots, but I'll give it to = = you...:-)

http://www.google.com/search?hl=3Den&lr=3D&q=3D5= 56793+furlongs+per+fortnight+in+knots&btnG=3DSearch=20 for those who can't think that quickly...

jason

On Jan = 19, 2005,=20 at 2:15 PM, Sky2high@aol.com wrote:

Thanks for = the=20 suggestion.

A=20 week ago I was zipping along at 556793 FF (Furls/Fortnit) and, doing = a quick=20 mental conversion for the sake of the LML Knot standard, I = noted that=20 it was a mere 180 = Kts.

E=20 Pluribus Unum

Grayhawk

------=_NextPart_000_005A_01C4FE4E.CC5DF3B0--