Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.160.219] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.2.5)
  with HTTP id 566392 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:41:12 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: landing lights
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.2.5
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:41:12 -0500
Message-ID: <web-566392@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <MMEELOPNFCJLIMPNNKMOEEHJDHAA.hapgoodm94@alum.darden.edu>
References: <MMEELOPNFCJLIMPNNKMOEEHJDHAA.hapgoodm94@alum.darden.edu>
X-Priority: 3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "Matt Hapgood" <hapgoodm94@alum.darden.edu>:

  Very creative.
  
  However, I don't think the 75 watt bulb inside that sealed area is a good
  idea.  While still constructing my 360 I left the wingtip recognition lights
  on in my garage for about 45 minutes.  The heat from those small lights
  deformed the plexiglass cover.  I hate to think what a 75 watt landing light
  would do...
  
  Matt

"""
     http://www.creativair.com/cva/product_info.php?cPath=22&products_id=34&o
  sCsid=ff8b15eff7dcc2faf4aa179c5f6b9940
"""