Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 08:30:54 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from esmtp.cave.com ([66.35.72.5] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 541598 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 08:26:27 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.35.72.5; envelope-from=lancair@ustek.com Received: from ustek.com ([66.35.73.227]) by esmtp.cave.com (VisNetic.MailServer.v7.2.4.1) with ESMTP id CQN38002 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 08:25:52 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <41A1E8E1.9060408@ustek.com> X-Original-Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 08:25:53 -0500 From: "Robert M. Simon" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: [LML] Re: 25 vs 40 hour fly off References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Marvin Kaye wrote: > Posted for "George Braly" : > Can somebody educate me a bit on the rules with respect to when a > 25 hour > fly – off period is permitted verses a 40 hour fly-off period? Depends on the individual doing the sign-off. My GlaStar had a Lyc that was rebuilt by a non-approved shop in Canada and mated to a Hartzell prop in an uncertified combination. The inspector said that since no significant changes had been made to any element, he would allow a 25 hr fly-off. That was my experience. Yours may vary ;-) . Robert M. Simon, N301ES