Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 12:42:47 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mxsf02.cluster1.charter.net ([209.225.28.202] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 497368 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 03 Nov 2004 12:17:01 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.225.28.202; envelope-from=troneill@charter.net Received: from mxip03.cluster1.charter.net (mxip03a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.133]) by mxsf02.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iA3HGVWc003349 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 12:16:32 -0500 Received: from sc3-24.217.131.57.charter-stl.com (HELO axs) (24.217.131.57) by mxip03.cluster1.charter.net with SMTP; 03 Nov 2004 12:16:32 -0500 X-Ironport-AV: i="3.86,117,1096862400"; d="scan'217,208"; a="408382896:sNHT19304466" X-Original-Message-ID: <001c01c4c1d1$3ed77610$6501a8c0@axs> From: "terrence o'neill" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Conductance of laminates X-Original-Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 12:16:30 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0019_01C4C19E.F397EC70" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0019_01C4C19E.F397EC70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jim,=20 Would you comment on the effeciveness and makeup of AOI Static Wicks = www.aero-options.com/static1.html ? From your and related thread, do you think unideirectional carbon rod = such as the carbon rods available from www.cstsales.com listed in their = catalog, could be used? Terrence O'Neill L235/320 N211AL ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Jim Cameron=20 To: Lancair Mailing List=20 Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 10:22 AM Subject: [LML] Conductance of laminates Don't know how the measurements of carbon lay-up conductance were = made, but we should be aware that conductance is a function of = frequency. Measurements made with any sort of ohmmeter are DC = conductance, which may tell nothing at all about conductance at the = frequencies of static noise. Static electricity has its own set of = rules, and the formulas seem to have things like ". . . eye of newt and = tongue of . . ." in them! Jim Cameron Legacy N121J ------=_NextPart_000_0019_01C4C19E.F397EC70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Jim,
Would you comment on the effeciveness = and makeup of=20 AOI Static Wicks www.aero-options.com/st= atic1.html=20 ?
From your and related thread, do you = think=20 unideirectional carbon rod such as the carbon rods available from www.cstsales.com listed in their = catalog,=20 could be used?
Terrence O'Neill
L235/320 N211AL
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Jim = Cameron=20
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, = 2004 10:22=20 AM
Subject: [LML] Conductance of=20 laminates

    Don't know how the = measurements of carbon lay-up conductance were made, but we should be = aware=20 that conductance is a function of frequency.  Measurements made = with any=20 sort of ohmmeter are DC conductance, which may tell nothing at all = about=20 conductance at the frequencies of static noise.  Static = electricity has=20 its own set of rules, and the formulas seem to have things like ". . . = eye of=20 newt and tongue of . . ." in them!
 
Jim Cameron
Legacy N121J
 
------=_NextPart_000_0019_01C4C19E.F397EC70--