Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 02:21:24 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [32.97.166.52] (HELO prserv.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 481206 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 01:43:23 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=32.97.166.52; envelope-from=mhutchins@attglobal.net Received: from marauder (67-40-50-126.dnvr.qwest.net[67.40.50.126]) by prserv.net (asmtp2) with SMTP id <2004102105425225200k2k7ne> (Authid: atp01); Thu, 21 Oct 2004 05:42:52 +0000 From: "Mike Hutchins" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Keeping Ada Cooling Cool - And Me, Too X-Original-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 23:42:53 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_01C4B6FE.85FDFCE0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 Thread-Index: AcS3MM9PlBwnZ5bTSXmJsglSyVq5wA== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Original-Message-ID: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C4B6FE.85FDFCE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Lynn, Sorry about the tone in the last post. I think I had too much caffeine and too little sleep. No excuses. I apologize if I offended you. I appreciate your participation in the list. Through sharing ideas we all benefit, even if we occasionally disagree with some of the views expressed. Please tell me more about your cowl. One thing Andy mentioned to me was that he felt the two openings were more efficient than the three originally used on the Legacy. Is this cowl strictly for a turbo Legacy or normally aspirated? If there has already been a discussion about this cowl design, could you point me to it so I can get up to speed. Thanks again and Best Regards, Mike Hutchins ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C4B6FE.85FDFCE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Lynn,

 

Sorry about the tone in the last post. I think I had = too much caffeine and too little sleep. No excuses. I apologize if I = offended you. I appreciate your participation in the list. Through sharing ideas we = all benefit, even if we occasionally disagree with some of the views = expressed.

 

Please tell me more about your cowl. One thing Andy mentioned to me was that he felt the two openings were more efficient = than the three originally used on the Legacy. Is this cowl strictly for a turbo Legacy = or normally aspirated? If there has already been a discussion about this = cowl design, could you point me to it so I can get up to = speed.

 

Thanks again and Best = Regards,

Mike = Hutchins

------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C4B6FE.85FDFCE0--