Return-Path: <lancair.list-request@olsusa.com>
Received: from smtp2.erols.com ([207.172.3.235]) by truman.olsusa.com
          (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35)
          with ESMTP id com for <lancair.list@olsusa.com>;
          Tue, 15 Jun 1999 07:01:50 -0400
Received: from preinstalledcom (207-172-194-108.s45.as1.grn.ny.dialup.rcn.com [207.172.194.108])
	by smtp2.erols.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id HAA12435
	for <lancair.list@olsusa.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 1999 07:08:12 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <37663289.595@erols.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 07:01:29 -0400
From: "Jeffrey B. Chipetine" <abcrental@erols.com>
Reply-To: abcrental@erols.com
To: lancair.list@olsusa.com
Subject: Valuation
X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com
Mime-Version: 1.0

          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
          <<  Lancair Builders' Mail List  >>
          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>
Robert,

I can see your plight.  May I respectfully suggest that your valuation
be at cost of materials.  

If your soon to be ex-wife's attorneys insist on one of the "big Money"
valuations as seen in TAP,  you should get your builder's log out and
submit a bill for your construction time as that justly represents the
un-reimbursed excess value of your project.  This is assuming that your
future ex had no significant "Hands-On" time.

Even an attorney should be able to see the logic behind this scenario. 
Alternatively,  you could offer to give her half and do the classic
chain saw trick....<g>...I wonder if a IV is rebondable after such
treatment.  
Good luck in your effort...I'm sure we all collectively wish you well.


Regards....Jeffrey B. Chipetine

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
LML homepage:   http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html