Return-Path: Received: from mail.cruzio.com ([208.226.92.37]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Tue, 15 Jun 1999 01:42:31 -0400 Received: from testelectronics.mail (sa-207-251-8-183.cruzio.com [207.251.8.183]) by mail.cruzio.com with SMTP id WAA17069 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 1999 22:45:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from main [192.168.16.1] by testelectronics.mail [192.168.16.1] with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.5.rB.b2.32-R) for ; Mon, 14 Jun 99 22:38:57 -0700 Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Mon, 14 Jun 1999 22:38:57 -0700 Message-ID: <01BEB6B6.B045CC60.ed@testelectronics.com> From: Ed Armstrong Reply-To: "ed@testelectronics.com" To: "'lancair.list@olsusa.com'" Subject: Re: Control Surface Balancing Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 22:38:55 -0700 Organization: Test Electronics X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> After reading all your posts, I agree and change my claims, elevator balancing is for flutter dampening and the bob-weights are for G forces. Thanks for correcting me or I would have balanced in the wrong direction. Regards, Ed Watsonville CA. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML homepage: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html