Return-Path: Received: from kestrel.solect.com ([198.235.53.26]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Mon, 14 Jun 1999 09:11:10 -0400 Received: from james (dhcp54-158 [204.50.54.158]) by solect.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA16863 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 1999 09:13:46 -0400 (EDT) From: "James Detenbeck" To: "Lancair List" Subject: RE: 320 vs. 360? Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 09:11:03 -0400 Message-ID: <000301beb667$5aa4f780$9e3632cc@james.solect.com> Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <3764895E.69E92310@eai.com> X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I was at the factory in February, and in addition to the HP of the engine, I understand that the factory uses 9:1 compression cylinders. I would like to hear from all if you can actually see the published numbers without a little "tweaking" James > I am building an LNC2 and would like more first-hand data on > performance of the 320 vs. 360 (160hp vs. 180 hp). It is soon > time for me to get serious about an engine choice. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML homepage: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html