Return-Path: Received: from asbestos.eai.com ([12.10.41.146]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Mon, 14 Jun 1999 00:45:04 -0400 Received: from goliath.eai.com (relay [10.1.1.80]) by asbestos.eai.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA02349 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 1999 21:52:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eai.com ([10.1.220.1]) by goliath.eai.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA537712 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 1999 23:48:09 -0500 (CDT) Really-From: olsen@eai.com Message-ID: <3764895E.69E92310@eai.com> Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 22:47:26 -0600 From: "Daniel M. Olsen" Organization: Engineering Animation, Inc. To: Lancair List Subject: 320 vs. 360? X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Greetings, I am building an LNC2 and would like more first-hand data on performance of the 320 vs. 360 (160hp vs. 180 hp). It is soon time for me to get serious about an engine choice. I would like to see "actual" cruise, climb and fuel consumption data for 320s and 360s from this group. Can anyone help? Thanks! Dan Olsen olsen@eai.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML homepage: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html