Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #25663
From: Skip Slater <skipslater@earthlink.net>
Sender: Marvin Kaye <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] More AOA
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 11:51:16 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Mark,
   No one is suggesting that AOA is the cure to accidents or that it offers a way to avoid stall training.  The point is that it's a tool which provides an aural stall warning that would hopefully help prevent a stall in the first place, and a visual display of the wing's efficiency should you have to recover from one.
  As I'm sure you know, an overly aggressive stall recovery can lead to another stall, a departure or even a spin.  An AOA, if properly used, enhances stall recovery by giving you an indication of when the wing is producing optimum lift.
   While Lancair advocates the inclusion of stall strips on its 4 seaters, most of us (myself included) didn't put them on.  My reason for not doing so was that I knew I'd have an AOA display to show me and actually tell me in my headset if I was approaching a stall.  The only time I should ever hear that voice is in the flare.  I still performed approaches to stall during my flight testing, but with the forward CG I have with only me in the plane, I couldn't get the nose to break, even at full aft stick.  I experienced the same thing in Lancair's factory ES.  Especially after viewing and reading Dave Allen's account of the unintentional spin he got into in an ES was a stark illustration that we don't want to do intentional deep stalls in these planes.  From my viewpoint, the tails (particularly the rudders) aren't big enough to get out of a fully developed spin, especially with an aft CG.  Lancair Certified addressed this issue on the Columbia 400 with a larger rudder and strake on the empennage.
   I'm a strong advocate for stall and spin training for anyone who flys a Lancair- just do it in another kind of plane.
   Skip Slater
   N540ES 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster