Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 09:27:18 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtp810.mail.sc5.yahoo.com ([66.163.170.80] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with SMTP id 3077152 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 08:33:10 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO corbel) (rfreilich@sbcglobal.net@64.217.124.27 with login) by smtp810.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Mar 2004 13:33:09 -0000 From: "rfreilich" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: sunglasses recommendations> X-Original-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 07:32:58 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: <01de01c408ff$b61af840$8a00a8c0@corbel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: Good morning group, There have been several fatal accidents attributed to polarized lenses = in sunglasses. Since there is normally little depth perception when flying above the surface of a body of water, any amount of reflective glare is helpful to determine the height above the surface. Polarized lenses cut glare, diminish or remove that very important visual clue. Though I = haven't seen any amphibious Lancairs (anyone want to compete for the Schneider Trophy?), there have been accidents where the craft was maneuvering to = land at strips near water and lack of depth perception was the main = contributing factor. The solution to this, of course, is to be aware of this = limitation and remove them when near water or opt for non-polarized lenses. Richard Freilich (now planeless) =20