Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:42:23 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-r02.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.98] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP id 2731756 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:24:02 -0500 Received: from VTAILJEFF@aol.com by imo-r02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r1.1.) id q.1ea.133c22e9 (4410) for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:23:58 -0500 (EST) From: VTAILJEFF@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <1ea.133c22e9.2ce669ad@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:23:57 EST Subject: Re: [LML] kinetic energy X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1068830637" X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5100 -------------------------------1068830637 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit So, the question is: Are the Lancair IVP heavy duty brakes-- rated at 425,000 ft-lbs, undersized for the job? Jeff Edwards LIVP N619SJ -------------------------------1068830637 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
So, the question is: Are the Lancair IVP heavy duty brakes-- rated at 4= 25,000 ft-lbs, undersized for the job?
 
Jeff Edwards
LIVP N619SJ
-------------------------------1068830637--