Return-Path: Received: from [65.33.167.37] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.5) with HTTP id 2629887 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 08:00:20 -0400 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: ifr training in a IV To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.5 Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 08:00:20 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "Andres Katz" : having owned a 182 turbo rg for 20 years and having flown over 700 IFR hours on it with many hours of instructor refreshing time I can say that there is no comparison between platforms. If you get behind (which happens frequently) with the skylane all you need to do is back the throttle and lower flaps and you can die 3 times of old age from the IAF to the MAP. I had the controllers yell at me to hurry up and put the plane on the ground with heavies behind me waiting to land. I never experienced this on my IV. Last week I took my biennial flight review and instrument competency check from Smithy (well known instructor from the Dallas area) and he likes to cover all usable instruments to simulate a partial panel. The IV is definitely not a stable platform. By the time we did the last approach I was glad I had support from my autopilot to allow me to fetch the chart, set the radios and follow the instructions. The plane gets out of a stable flight very rapidly and is not friendly. we heard the AOA a couple of times during approaches due to changing speeds. I can tell that real instruments conditions can not be extrapolated from a 172 to a IV. There is no comparison. Regarding IFR flying and safety, why get a rating and not use it? Just came back from a round trip to ELP, KSKX to Dallas and at flight level 210 every other cloud had a trace of moisture that stuck to the leading edges. You have to make decisions and every flight is a challenge. On saturday when I wanted to do ELP to KSKX (Taos in NM) ice and airmets with heavy moisture kept me on the ground but sunday was magnificent with a GPS approach to Taos that followed the lines on the Garmin 530. A bit of icing in the clouds again but scattered. Back to Dallas to a 400 ceiling and and ILS to home with plenty of visibility and fortunately no ice but txs to the stormscope I avoided all the heavy stuff. If you heard the lady at wxbrief you would have stayed in Taos till tuesday. Life is a challenge. If you own a IV get your training on it, its imperative. andres