Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 07:57:45 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [199.185.220.240] (HELO priv-edtnes51.telusplanet.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5) with ESMTP id 2629837 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 06:50:36 -0400 Received: from Tablet ([142.179.201.236]) by priv-edtnes51.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with SMTP id <20031009105034.LXEC14290.priv-edtnes51.telusplanet.net@Tablet>; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 04:50:34 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: <002001c38e53$2cc6ed50$4a01a8c0@Tablet> From: "Gerry Leinweber" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: IFR training in a IV-P? X-Original-Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 04:50:37 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 My opinion is that IFR training for "amateur" (non-professional) pilots, has unique challenges relative to time available (usually in short supply - we have a full time career outside of flying), equipment and instrument familiarity (how many IV-P's with your specific instrument panel & autopilot can you rent at your airport?), and flying experience (some have been military/commercial pilots with thousands of hours flying as a crew member, others have fewer than 1000 hours) and finally at $225 US per hour to fly such a plane, money to train is not unlimited. Taking these facts into consideration, and based on my experience (I've had my IFR for 10 years, but let it lapse while finishing my IV-P you know, just a few months and we are done syndrome that goes on for 2 years so I feel I have earned my rating twice, once in a Grumman Tiger without an auto-pilot, and recently in my IV-P with a good auto-pilot) the real vital ingredients to successful training and ultimately safer flying are: 1.) having access to a simulator which is very close if not identical to the instrumentation you will fly in with your IV-P. 2) taking time to do intensive training, not one hour per week, rather book time off and train (study, simulator, and fly 8 hours per day) until you get the rating. Imagine the navy trying to train a pilot to land on a carrier one hour every week or so. 3) having an instructor who can travel to your home airport and adapt the learning process to the level the student is at, including managing the various issues of ego and cockpit management Let me elaborate. 1.) For example, I have a Garmin 430/420 combo, with a STec 55 and a Sandel HSI. I also have little goodies like an AOA pro model, a storm scope and a RMI uEncoder along with a VM1000 engine monitor for such things as fuel flow and engine performance. Each of which takes some in depth knowledge and operating experience to get good at and even more vital, you need an instructor who really knows how to integrate the functions of these instruments so you as a pilot can be trained to stay ahead of the aircraft. Such a simulator, also lets the instructor or student when practicing to slow the speed down to learn procedures if required, or redo one task over and over until you get it right. Remember, practice does not make perfect. Perfect practice makes perfect. 2.) Too many people say time is money. IMHO, Time is far more valuable than money. Just stop and think. How many dollars would it cost to buy back yesterday? The key to any successful training in any field is to do it full time, intensively, as in immersion. From languages to piloting, part time is the hardest way to learn, the least effective, and ultimately, the most expensive. If you want to be above the clouds in a IV-P, safely above the weather, and truly saving time over driving or flying commercially, invest the time to be trained properly, and then, schedule the time for recurrent training. 3) If at all possible, you do want to learn in your neck of the woods, where ultimately you will be doing over 1/2 your approaches and flying. Learning from a professional how they would handle various situations in your local area will result in greater transfer of "experience" than being overwhelmed by learning new "local knowledge on top of the training. Keep it simple. I seem to remember from my day as a student that people who studied in the same room they wrote the exam in did about 10% better. I'd like that 10% on my side. So, in conclusion, what the Lancair world needs is a number of instructors who are up to date with the latest equipment, are good patient teachers who can customize a simulator to be almost identical to your unique panel, and can travel to your area to train you. Ideally they would first train you over the internet on ground school and simulator flying, and then when you are fully ready, come to your airport and train for a number of days, totally immersing the student in IFR flying. Such a training plan would result in safer pilots and fewer accidents. And I'll bet someone is developing just such a plan because it is truly needed. Gerry Leinweber C-GLFP 150+ hours and IFR rating renewed July 1, 2003 on Canada's birthday, I celebrated well