Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 12:58:26 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-2550124@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <artbertolina@earthlink.net>
Received: from smtp3.pacifier.net ([64.255.237.173] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.1)
  with ESMTP id 2548896 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 12:10:35 -0400
Received: from artlt (dsl-133-78.tstonramp.com [206.55.133.78])
	by smtp3.pacifier.net (Postfix) with SMTP id C2F836D663
	for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:10:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-Message-ID: <003701c36cb5$282faf80$4400000a@tstonramp.com>
From: "Art/Sue Bertolina" <artbertolina@earthlink.net>
X-Original-To: "Lancair list Lancair list" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Cabosil
X-Original-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:06:20 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600

To Larry Graves
Is there an advantage or disadvantage to Cabosil or
Flox in a structural bond
Regards
Art