Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 12:00:37 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from cepheus.email.starband.net ([148.78.249.123] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.1) with ESMTP id 2544361 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 11:46:42 -0400 Received: from regandesigns.com (vsat-148-63-101-227.c002.t7.mrt.starband.net [148.63.101.227]) by cepheus.email.starband.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7OFkY3o032304 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 05:46:38 +1400 X-Original-Message-ID: <3F48DDD8.2000308@regandesigns.com> X-Original-Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 08:46:32 -0700 From: Brent Regan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Subject: Re: Antenna Performance Demo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Charles writes: <<<>> True enough BUT a high VSWR will virtually guarantee poor performance relative to the same antenna with a low VSWR. <<<< Without doing antenna range type measurements, I am concerned with using carbon fiber as your ground plane.>>> Yes, me too, that is why you should install the 22" X . The point was (is) that to get most of the benefit you don't need a solid ground PLANE, just 4 wires spaced 90 degrees apart. Builders have reported good and bad performance with just carbon but this fix is so easy, cheap, light and quick to install that there is no good reason NOT to do it. It worked in the demo and it works in my plane and as I have said before, one test is worth a thousand expert opinions. It may not be the absolute best solution but it gets you 98% of the way there with 10% of the effort. When was the last time THAT happened? Regards Brent Regan For more on VSWR: http://www.antennex.com/preview/vswr.htm