Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #19692
From: <VTAILJEFF@aol.com>
Sender: Marvin Kaye <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Essential Buss versus Fuel Endurance
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 23:33:32 -0400
To: <lml>
Shannon,

I am sorry if you took the last post to mean that I was calling you a "punk".
I did not intend you to take it that way but rather posted it to ask you if
you feel lucky. Unfortunately, we are discussing apples and oranges. You are
discussing hardware (electrical system) and I am talking about decision making.

I am a multi thousand hour ATP with multiple CFI ratings and am also a
Designated PIlto examiner as well as a former Naval Flight Office (A-6 Intruders). I
am also an aircraft accident investigator with over 10 years experience and
many hundreds of aircraft accidents investigated under my belt. I have also
built and flown my own LIVP. From my limited experience, it is my opinion that if
man can design it, and build it, it will eventually fail-- and probably not
in the most fault tolerant way possible. The Challenger and Columbia are two
good examples.

Also I can tell you that as a much younger NFO in an A-6, I took off one day
in an Intruder with a generator that wouldn't stay on line--thinking, like
you, "no big deal, I've got a second generator, a ram air turbine and a battery
for backup--quadruple redundancy. Shortly after takeoff, EVERYTHING failed,
second gen, RAT and the battery-- oh yeah, we were IMC. Try flying in IMC in a
fighter jet with your 2" peanut gyro spinning down to nothing. Fortunately we
found a small hole, got underneath and found our way back to base where there
was a 400' ceiling and 1 mile vis. My decision to take off was a bad one. The
hardware redundancy failed me and almost cost me my life.

What amazes me about this list is the abundance of pilots who are willing to
risk their lives to "limp" on to the destination with a failed "this" or
broken "that", to penetrate thunderstorms, press into icing,  duck under minimums,
perform low altitude "airshows", etc. Many pilots takes thes kinds of risk
every day and do OK, some do not.

Do the names Durrizzi and Moser ring a bell? Durrizzi took a LIVP cross
country with out a fully tested & functioning fuel system. Moser took a LIV into
severe convective weather without a working stormscope. THIS IS NOT THE WAY TO
LIVE TO BE AN OLD PILOT. What would your wife or mother say sitting there in
the right seat? "Get me on the ground NOW"

I invite you to come to Oshkosh and listen to my Forum presentation on "Pilot
Malpractice, Learning From Accidents" I will present it on Thursday, July
31st a 4:00 pm in Air BP Pavilion #4.

I am not trying to "flame" you or others on this list-- I am just trying to
pass along  the benefit of my experience and urge you to fly conservatively and
prudently.  There are too many great, experienced pilots who just monitor
this list every day but don't chime in because they are tired of discussing
"prudent" flying with guys who don't get it. Start "getting it". You are discussing
hardware. Hardware will always fail you. Good decision making won't.  

Jeff Edwards
"fly safe"




Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster