Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:39:54 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [63.150.227.63] (HELO admsmxs2usr10.ad.jocoks.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b9) with ESMTP id 2478650 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:27:09 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [LML] Re: LNC2 header tank/forward deck assembly sequence X-Original-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 08:27:08 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <4B9B1B1833408C40AE2F14A881F276F610B395@admsmxs2usr10.ad.jocoks.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: LNC2 header tank/forward deck assembly sequence Thread-Index: AcNM7NNN+qOv3XOeQHu5rJeLIc8VSAAQmq2g From: "Metcalfe, Lee, AIR" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" If I were building an LNC2 today I would eliminate the header tank and go with the expanded wing tanks. I hate having all that fuel in the cockpit with me, and I would prefer to have access to the footwell (rudder pedals & cables, brakes & reservior, vacuum regulator, aux fuel pump, electrical busses) and back of the panel. My fuel system is set up so I can pull straight from the wing tanks, so I don't need the header. Lee Metcalfe N320WH - Kansas City