Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 08:22:14 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-2471741@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <fwegli@astound.net>
Received: from m01.ca.astound.net ([64.85.239.11] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b9)
  with ESMTP id 2471595 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 01:52:37 -0400
Received: from fred2000 (astound-66-234-198-76.ca.astound.net [66.234.198.76])
	by m01.ca.astound.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h6B74JLe008990
	for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 00:04:19 -0700
X-Original-Message-ID: <000501c34771$2bd14f40$4cc6ea42@fred2000>
From: "FredE" <fwegli@astound.net>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-2470733@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Exhaust Blisters
X-Original-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 22:56:28 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
Disposition-Notification-To: "FredE" <fwegli@astound.net>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

Steve,
I have a normally aspirated Lancair IV with ES cowling on it. In my opinion,
it is prettier, aerodynamically cleaner, and faster than with the
"blisters". Why not try fitting the ES cowl and see if there is any problem.
You will probably like it.
Fred Egli LIV N1228E