Return-Path: Received: from [65.173.216.66] (account ) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1b7) with HTTP id 2400902 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 03 Jun 2003 16:54:15 -0400 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: TSIO 550 Rich or Lean of Peak? To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1b7 Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 16:54:15 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <006b01c32a0b$2e213180$0700a8c0@shannon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "Shannon Knoepflein" : I guess its personal preference. I would like to hear your reasoning...heres mine: If you are someone that can't handle stress and forgets easy, I would certainly agree. I guess it's all about level of comfort...for me its comfortable knowing that I have to push all three knobs in, and there is also a side benefit in these high power machines. Having the prop pulled back reduces power, as does having the mixture set to LOP. If you've ever shoved the throttle all the way in on a 300+ HP engine, I think you'll see my point. Shoving the throttle in creates a huge amount of torque that has to be reacted too, possibly even too much, especially at these dangerously low speeds....NOT A GOOD THING IMHO. Having the prop pulled back and mixture LOP reduces this affect. There is CERTAINLY enough power at 2200 rpm LOP to get you off the ground. Once you get the throttle in, then add the prop for some more power, and last the mixture for full take off power. No damage will occur in this short period of time, all of 3-5 seconds maybe. However, the power application will be smoother and safer IMHO. YMMV. Can you show me where my method falls short? Maybe I'm missing something. I realize its what we've always been taught, but that does NOT mean its correct. Flame suit on....... --- Shannon Knoepflein <---> kycshann@kyol.net