Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 09:32:33 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-r06.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.102] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b6) with ESMTP id 2358479 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 21 May 2003 22:40:06 -0400 Received: from Billhogarty@aol.com by imo-r06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.22.) id q.67.11215997 (3932) for ; Wed, 21 May 2003 22:40:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Billhogarty@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <67.11215997.2bfd9280@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 22:40:00 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Stiff controls at higher speeds in IV-P X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_67.11215997.2bfd9280_boundary" X-Mailer: 7.0 for Windows sub 10625 --part1_67.11215997.2bfd9280_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Skips mention of the possibility of slackness in the cable for S-Tec roll servo reminds me that I used a short steel rod with bearings each end to connect the roll servo to the aileron cross over pushrod. Perhaps this is why I dont seem to have a problem with the autopilot roll control. I notice that the ailerons are much easier to operate when using a hand on both control grips. Maybe old age is getting to be a factor???? Bill Hogarty --part1_67.11215997.2bfd9280_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Skips mention of the possibility of slackness in the cable for S-Tec roll se= rvo reminds me that I used a short steel rod with bearings each end to conne= ct the roll servo to the aileron cross over pushrod.
Perhaps this is why I dont seem to have a problem with the autopilot roll co= ntrol.
I notice that the ailerons are much easier to operate when using a ha= nd on both control grips. Maybe old age is getting to be a factor????&= nbsp; Bill Hogarty --part1_67.11215997.2bfd9280_boundary--