Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 09:34:11 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from web41005.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.4] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b6) with SMTP id 2357608 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 21 May 2003 09:33:25 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <20030521133318.82021.qmail@web41005.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [165.247.226.6] by web41005.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 21 May 2003 06:33:18 PDT X-Original-Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 06:33:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Jim Thomas Subject: Legacy Landing/Taxi Light X-Original-To: New Mail List Lancair MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I have decided to add both the wing mounted and landing gear mounted lights to my Legacy. My reasoning for the wing mounted lights is that I want to run my pulse lights during climb and decent and in the airport traffic area for collision avoidance. I couldn't do this if the lights were mounted on the gear. While attending a safety seminar in Anchorage, Alaska we were told that operating our landing lights could reduce the chance of a bird strike by as much as 50%. I fear a bird strike almost as much as I fear a close encounter with another aircraft. My home base airport, Pine Mountain Lake (Q68) also has lots of deer on the runway, especially at dusk. For this reason, I am installing additional lights on my gear, so when I am landing I can illuminate more of the runway. The cost of one deer strike more than pays for the additional lighting. The pulse light will power the wing and gear lights, but the gear lights will be hooked to a relay that will not allow them to be powered when the gear is in the gear wells. If all goes well, I may get to see if the system works as intended in about 6 months. Jim Thomas Legacy #166 __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com