Return-Path: Received: from [65.173.216.66] (account ) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1b4) with HTTP id 2333817 for ; Mon, 05 May 2003 12:39:12 -0400 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Electrical System - Battery Charging To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1b4 Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 12:39:12 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <006701c31323$c82d2210$0700a8c0@shannon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "Shannon Knoepflein" : Nothing against the product you are selling, but I would tend to with something has more of a published charging/maintaining curve. That advertisement looks a lot like snake oil to me. I've yet to see any proof (nor has Bob N of aeroelectric.com) that these desulphaters do anything. I hope someone proves him wrong. Until then, I personally like the Battery Tender at http://www.batterytender.com , which has a published charging graph. It charges at 1.25 amps until the battery reaches 14.4 volts (bulk charge), then maintains 14.4 volts until the current goes under 0.1A (absorption). Then it switches over to float/maintenance mode and drops the voltage down to 13.2 volts and holds the current under 0.1A. This will charge and maintain any battery without risk of overcharging/overheating. I think Brent Regan suggested just the other day of not holding a battery at anything over 13.8V, and I concur. This little smart charger certainly meets the bill. --- Shannon Knoepflein <---> kycshann@kyol.net