Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 14:43:32 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m06.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.161] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b4) with ESMTP id 2148236 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 11:09:11 -0400 Received: from Newlan2dl@aol.com by imo-m06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.22.) id q.cc.1bffd402 (3657) for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 11:09:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Newlan2dl@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 11:09:03 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Fw: Acoustic spray X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: 7.0 for Windows sub 10637 Hi Craig I know of a generic type of spary used as a damper. It's used on cars for the underbody to damp the metal vibration. You can contact EAR products but I'll check my data to see if I can come up with a supplier. The problem is it's pretty heavy also. I also don't know it that stuff is what you heard about or not and whetehr it will meet FAR 25.853 for burn. I don't know how much of a rush you are in but I am currently working with Dave Morss to develop data on various weights, efficiencies and costs of different materials. I believe I have a very good light weight solution for acoustics utilizing isolation, barrier (light but thick) and absorber but I won't know how effective that is compared to the heavier weight massive barriers until I do the testing with Dave. For the testing with Dave, we will be insulating each part of the plane with individual blankets and then go off and do flight testing, rip it out then try the next one. What I hope to achieve is a determination of how effective each different material is from absorbers only (fiberglass batting which is what I normally use when I desuign stuff for the airlines) to massive barriers with absorbers (what we use for business jets and Head of State aircraft). The bottom line is I am very much hoping to improve the current types of acoustic insulation package in terms of both weight improvement and acoustics. As a benefit, the thermal will also be enhanced. It probably will be more expensive unless the absorber type works well in which case both weight and cost will go down but I doubt that will work all that well. Still, that too will be compared. I'll post the findings later but it will be probably 2-3 months I'm guessing to aquire and massage the data. Dan Newland Super ES