Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 17:49:53 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [64.8.50.178] (HELO mta2.adelphia.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b3) with ESMTP id 2120191 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 10:00:20 -0400 Received: from worldwinds ([207.175.254.66]) by mta2.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.32 201-253-122-126-132-20030307) with SMTP id <20030412140019.IBTP15786.mta2.adelphia.net@worldwinds> for ; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 10:00:19 -0400 From: "Gary Casey" X-Original-To: "lancair list" Subject: ES landing gear fairings X-Original-Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 07:00:50 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal <<<> I modified the shape of my gear leg fairings compared to the recommended by clamping to produce a "cusp" and then a blunt trailing edge. I used the standard wheel fairings, which fit reasonably well by my standards - probably not to discriminating standards. However, making the wheel fairings level produced an "angle if incidence" of the leg fairing that may not be good. Then I made all-new on-piece fuselage fairings of my own design. They obviously fit the gear leg fairings very well. These fairings attach to the fuselage with screws and slide down the gear leg for service. The gear leg will have to be removed to remove the fairing. The wheel fairings also seem to me to be quite heavy and I wonder how durable they will be with the pounding they take. Gary Casey ES #157