Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 23:58:38 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-d06.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.38] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b2) with ESMTP id 2111869 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 09 Apr 2003 19:47:27 -0400 Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-d06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.21.) id q.18e.1888ac3d (3310) for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 19:47:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <18e.1888ac3d.2bc60b04@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 19:47:16 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] porting or Chuck's beautiful headers.. X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_18e.1888ac3d.2bc60b04_boundary" X-Mailer: Unknown sub 120 --part1_18e.1888ac3d.2bc60b04_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 4/9/2003 2:20:13 PM Central Daylight Time, Rob.Logan@philips.com writes: > why would someone spend $$ on porting or Chuck's beautiful headers to > have the same max RPM? Why? Why? To increase torque which allows an increase in bite (pitch) which can increase the thrust which should lead to higher speed. After all, any aircraft engine can turn a prop at 2700 rpm, just depends on "la Mordida." --part1_18e.1888ac3d.2bc60b04_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 4/9/2003 2:20:13 PM Central Dayligh= t Time, Rob.Logan@philips.com writes:

why would someone spend $$ on p= orting or Chuck's beautiful headers to
have the same max RPM?  


Why? Why? To increase torque which allows an increase in bite (pitch) which=20= can increase the thrust which should lead to higher speed.  After all,=20= any aircraft engine can turn a prop at 2700 rpm, just depends on "la Mordida= ."
 --part1_18e.1888ac3d.2bc60b04_boundary--