Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:50:40 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-2090149@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <VTAILJEFF@aol.com>
Received: from imo-r09.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.105] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b2)
  with ESMTP id 2090129 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:35:03 -0500
Received: from VTAILJEFF@aol.com
	by imo-r09.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.21.) id q.197.17e107b9 (3972)
	 for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:34:54 -0500 (EST)
From: VTAILJEFF@aol.com
X-Original-Message-ID: <197.17e107b9.2bb4ac5e@aol.com>
X-Original-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:34:54 EST
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: TSIO 550C Engine vs IO 550N
X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 113

There are big differences. Why not just buy a normally aspirated engine to 
begin with?

Jeff Edwards
N619SJ LIVP