Return-Path: <Root@Logan.com>
Received: from [24.50.193.34] (HELO dell)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.5)
  with ESMTP-TLS id 2013044 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 08 Feb 2003 20:41:28 -0500
Message-ID: <003401c2cfdc$5c771ce0$053b3690@dell>
From: "Root" <Root@Logan.com>
To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Fw: LNC2 extended wing tanks.
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 20:41:25 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

 From: "Jeffrey Peterson" <jbp@fire.phys.cmu.edu>

Lorn,

My motivation for the wing tank extension is to get rid of the header 
tank. That also eliminates the facet pump system. I will use a 2-way 
fuel valve.  Like the Legacy.

I dont like fuel above my lap.  Could turn a minor accident into a
very bad day.

I have seen two 360s done this way and was impressed. Easy access to the 
avionics is an added feature.

-Jeff

-- 
Jeff Peterson
Dept. of Physics
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh PA 15213

phone: 412-268-2785
fax    412-681-0648