Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 08:16:37 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [64.8.50.184] (HELO mta4.adelphia.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.5) with ESMTP id 2007597 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 03 Feb 2003 07:07:27 -0500 Received: from library ([216.227.164.227]) by mta4.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.25 201-253-122-126-125-20021216) with SMTP id <20030203120726.HDSZ3223.mta4.adelphia.net@library> for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 07:07:26 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <000e01c2cb7c$d0e33690$e3a4e3d8@library> From: "Doug Pohl" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Goodbye X-Original-Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 07:07:25 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000B_01C2CB52.E7CCCA30" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C2CB52.E7CCCA30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To my fellow flyers, The Code of Conduct is a good idea and yet the responses on line were = nothing but critical with the very public EngineAir engine once again = negatively spotlighted. I don't want to talk about EngineAir. This = issue has nothing to do with EngineAir. Wherever the truth may be for = developers of new technologies, these responses indicate that there is = no patience for the growing pains associated with new technologies and = the little guy in aviation doesn't stand a chance on or off the = internet. Ask yourselves, how many companies have come and gone in = recent years and what have WE done to help them along? It's a tough = business, made harder by these types of criticisms. Please do this for = me. Go back in the archives, read some of the discussions and ask = yourselves, were the discussions constructive or destructive? Did they = help or hurt? I have...... I wish you all well. Marv, please immediately cancel my LML = subscription. Doug ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C2CB52.E7CCCA30 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To my fellow flyers,
 
The Code of Conduct is a good idea and = yet the=20 responses on line were nothing but critical with the very public = EngineAir=20 engine once again negatively spotlighted.  I don't want to talk = about=20 EngineAir.  This issue has nothing to do with=20 EngineAir.  Wherever the truth may be for developers of new=20 technologies, these responses indicate that there is no patience for the = growing=20 pains associated with new technologies and the little guy in = aviation=20 doesn't stand a chance on or off the internet.  Ask yourselves, how = many=20 companies have come and gone in recent years and what have WE done to = help them=20 along?  It's a tough business, made harder by these types of=20 criticisms.  Please do this for me.  Go back in the archives, = read=20 some of the discussions and ask yourselves, were the discussions = constructive or=20 destructive?  Did they help or hurt?  I = have......
 
I wish you all well.  Marv, please = immediately=20 cancel my LML subscription.
 
Doug
------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C2CB52.E7CCCA30--