Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2003 15:34:32 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [205.152.58.101] (HELO imf52bis.bellsouth.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.5) with ESMTP id 2006933 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 02 Feb 2003 10:28:23 -0500 Received: from bellsouth.net ([67.35.121.116]) by imf52bis.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.25 201-253-122-122-125-20020815) with ESMTP id <20030202153021.EHNA9487.imf52bis.bellsouth.net@bellsouth.net> for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 10:30:21 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <3E3D3948.C410EC8A@bellsouth.net> X-Original-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2003 09:29:12 -0600 From: Joseph Bartels X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Response to Doug Pohl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mr. Pohl has brought forward comments about a conversation I had with an potential Aero-Cool customer. The customer began extolling the virtues of the EngineAir engine. He went on to tell about how much he trusted the engine and how he planned to use his EngineAir powered aircraft for night IFR use. I explained that I had been a customer of EngineAir earlier on in its program and that EngineAir could not deliver the product on time. I stated that Jim Rahm had refunded fully my deposit and that we had left on favorable terms. I further explained that EngineAir's product did not have a positive history to date and that to insure his ability to fly more than repair and engineer he should perhaps obtain another engine such as the Continental or Walter Turbine. I asked the gentleman to contact Tom Zedeker for specifics as to those problems Tom had experienced. Information regarding how many "dead sticks" Mr. Pohl experienced never came up. The number of "dead sticks" that Tom Zedeker experienced did come up, as well as other well known failures. While Mr. Pohl may be under the mistaken impression that my comments to his friend were made to so that Lancair may gain financially from the sale of another engine, let me reassure him, his friend and those reading these comments that our customers are more than customers. Our customers become our friends and family. We do not wish any of our friends and family members to fly IFR behind any engine which does not have a substantial and well proven safety history. While we may not be "pleasingly perfect in every way," we endeavor to become so. I believe that the vast majority of our Lancair IV customers wish to use their aircraft for fun and reliable transportation. My understanding of the reliability, so far, of the EngineAir engine/gearbox combination does not lead me to the belief that currently that combination can be used with any great degree of reliability. Finally, the code of conduct which Mr. Pohl espouses should not call for hiding or misrepresenting facts. When the EngineAir product reaches the degree of reliability and safety that both the Continental, Lycoming and Walter engines have, I will be the first to promote its use in Lancairs. Joe Bartels