Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2003 08:57:27 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [148.78.247.23] (HELO hestia.email.starband.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.5) with ESMTP id 2006858 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 02 Feb 2003 07:03:23 -0500 Received: from starband.net (vsat-148-64-23-255.c050.t7.mrt.starband.net [148.64.23.255]) by hestia.email.starband.net (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id h12C3FIu029567 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 07:03:18 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <3E3D091D.3000804@starband.net> X-Original-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2003 04:03:41 -0800 From: "Hamid A. Wasti" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: [LML] Code of Conduct References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Doug Pohl wrote: >Concerning the general conduct of our group and its postings (and I include >myself as an occasional participant in this), I think the negativity and >bickering on a number of different issues has made us lose sight of our >priorities. > In that spirit, I have to ask you Doug, did you try and communicate with Mr. Bartel and resolve the matter privately, or did you just start of by blasting him and everyone else publicly? >Always seek to encourage development of new ideas and support those who >in good faith are undertaking these projects. It benefits us all. > Did you communicate with Mr. Bartel and try to determine if his PRIVATE statements were because of a misunderstanding which could be corrected privately, or did you just assume that he was acting in bad faith and attacked him publicly? Hamid