Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 09:58:37 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [64.8.50.184] (HELO mta4.adelphia.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.5) with ESMTP id 1996635 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 09:40:27 -0500 Received: from worldwinds ([207.175.254.66]) by mta4.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.25 201-253-122-126-125-20021216) with SMTP id <20030124144025.YPFS3223.mta4.adelphia.net@worldwinds> for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 09:40:25 -0500 From: "Gary Casey" X-Original-To: "lancair list" Subject: diesels X-Original-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 06:37:26 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 <> As a rule of thumb diesels reject more heat to both the coolant and the oil than do spark-ignition engines. Also, the differential temperature between the ambient air and the "coolant" is less - the air-cooled cylinders are at maybe 350 degrees and the coolant is at about 200. In theory then it takes about a 20% lower mass air flow rate to cool an air-cooled spark ignition engine than a liquid-cooled diesel. Because the air-cooled cylinders are so poorly optimized for air flow and the radiator is so well optimized the pressure drop across a radiator is likely less than across an air-cooled cylinder. All that means that given enough space (where would that exist on a Lancair?) the resulting cooling drag of a liquid-cooled engine COULD be less than for an air-cooled engine. I think you would be lucky to break even. Bottom line is yes, you may need a bigger scoop, but an ugly one? That's in the eye of the beholder. I think the ES cooling inlets are oversize to begin with, but that's just a guess so far. Gary Casey