Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 10:33:15 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtprelay1.dc3.adelphia.net ([24.50.78.4] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.2) with ESMTP id 1897872 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 09:09:08 -0500 Received: from worldwinds ([207.175.254.66]) by smtprelay1.dc3.adelphia.net (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id H6UVB60D.J0S for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2002 09:09:06 -0500 From: "Gary Casey" X-Original-To: "lancair list" Subject: aileron balancing X-Original-Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 06:06:22 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal previous post: >>2. Make sure that the entire aileron LE (where the weights are attached) is STIFF as can be. You must not be able to flex this area at all otherwise, the aileron will vibrate in flight. Most have added half-moon ribs to accomplish this (same method used for the flaps, however you must make sure water cannot accumulate in the mid sections, drain holes will have to be drilled). On my setup, I only installed one half-moon rib, right in the middle plus another 2-bid on the entire length of the LE... >> Sounds reasonable. What would you think of a 2-bid that would go straight from the top of the weight and extend back on the aileron surface. It would be suspended in space, but not for very far, so it should be reasonably stiff (could still buckle in compression, I suppose) and would certainly stiffen the structure in beaming. The weight isn't much of a consideration as it is ahead of the hinge point. Just a thought. Gary Casey ES