Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 15:24:56 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from qmail.accesscomm.ca ([204.83.142.82] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.2) with SMTP id 1893714 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 03 Dec 2002 15:15:44 -0500 Received: (qmail 3956 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2002 20:15:45 -0000 Received: from cust140-67.weyburn.accesscomm.ca (HELO local) (216.174.140.67) by qmail.accesscomm.ca with SMTP; 3 Dec 2002 20:15:45 -0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <000701c29b08$e8df7f00$8200a8c0@accesscomm.ca> From: "JJ JOHNSON" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: [LML] 235 wing tips X-Original-Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 14:16:47 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0004_01C29AD6.9DADFF20" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01C29AD6.9DADFF20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm wondering if anyone has designed or changed the existing wing tip of = the 235 model. I've been told that the old style tip created more drag = than newer styles and am wondering if anyone has changed this in their = a/c. What about winglets? Jarrett Johnson 235/320 50% ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01C29AD6.9DADFF20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm wondering if anyone has designed or = changed the=20 existing wing tip of the 235 model. I've been told that the old style = tip=20 created more drag than newer styles and am wondering if anyone has = changed this=20 in their a/c. What about winglets?
 
Jarrett Johnson
235/320 50%
 
------=_NextPart_000_0004_01C29AD6.9DADFF20--