Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 10:49:31 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-r04.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.100] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.2) with ESMTP id 1893480 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 03 Dec 2002 09:59:22 -0500 Received: from AVIDWIZ@aol.com by imo-r04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id q.7e.31ed359d (15901) for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 09:59:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from aol.com (mow-d15.webmail.aol.com [205.188.139.131]) by air-id09.mx.aol.com (v89.21) with ESMTP id MAILINID94-1203095913; Tue, 03 Dec 2002 09:59:13 -0500 X-Original-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 09:57:40 -0500 From: AVIDWIZ@aol.com X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: LIV-PT Fuel Tank & Dukes Pressure Controller MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Message-ID: <6FFCD9B8.0DAB6D42.001476CA@aol.com> X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Gentlemen: Three followups: 1) AUX FUEL CAPACITY As I understood it, the belly tank was the last point in the fuel chain and hence, it was fed by the wings. I was also told that another buillder had developed a 38 gal tank for the baggage area reducing the need for any substantial amounts of fuel under the belly. 2) TURBINE ENGINE CHOICE: I was also told that a couple of builders were planning on the Garrett Turbine which uses 40% less fuel but costs double the Walters. 3) REAL WORLD TURBINE IVP EXPERIENCES The fcatory says that there are 13 IVPT aircraft currently flying. Hopefully a few of these owners will respond to the list and share their experiences. 4) DUKES PRESSURE CONTROLLER: I also have an all electric panel and hence no vacum system. It seems that the theroy of venting the cabin via deflation of the door seal is a viable option. I had the door seal fail at 16,500 and can assure you the cabin vents its pressurization plenty quickly! Dave Riggs